Lake Erie Connector project would have built a power line underneath Lake Erie, connecting Ontario to Pennsylvania and a broader U.S. electricity system
Published Apr 09, 2024 • Last updated Apr 09, 2024 • 4 minute read
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
Ehren Cory, CEO of the Canada Infrastructure Bank , testified Tuesday in front of MPs on the House of Commons Infrastructure committee about the Lake Erie Connector project.Photo by House of Commons
Article content
OTTAWA – The head of the Canada Infrastructure Bank defended $900,000 spent on a now-cancelled power line project, arguing the project will ultimately get built and the due diligence the bank did was entirely reasonable.
Ehren Cory, the bank’s CEO, testified Tuesday in front of MPs on the House of Commons Infrastructure committee about the Lake Erie Connector project, a proposed power line underneath Lake Erie and connecting Ontario to Pennsylvania and a broader U.S. electricity system.
Advertisement 2
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay, Rex Murphy and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
Unlimited online access to National Post and 15 news sites with one account.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
Support local journalism.
SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE ARTICLES
Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.
Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay, Rex Murphy and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
Unlimited online access to National Post and 15 news sites with one account.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
Support local journalism.
REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
The bank agreed in 2021 to offer a $655-million loan to the project and spent $900,000 on due diligence involving lawyers and outside experts. The project has since been suspended and the original owner sold its interest to another company. The loan did not go through, but the $900,000 had already been spent.
Cory defended the due diligence spending, saying it represented just 0.14 per cent of the loan the bank was offering and they need to ensure they are being careful with taxpayer dollars.
“When you’re investing Canadian taxpayers money, making large scale loan agreements like we are, I think that’s an expectation that you as parliamentarians would have of us,” he told MPs.
In response to Cory, Conservative MP Leslyn Lewis argued that the project being cancelled meant the entirety of that $900,000 was now gone, spent on a project that would never be completed.
“The money is of no value now because the project is cancelled, so you’re confirming that $900,000 of taxpayers money has now been wasted because the project is now cancelled,” she said.
Cory said the new owners of the proposed line are looking closely at the project and the CIB believes it is likely construction will happen.
First Reading
Your guide to the world of Canadian politics. (Subscriber exclusive on Saturdays)
By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.
Thanks for signing up!
A welcome email is on its way. If you don’t see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of First Reading will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Article content
Advertisement 3
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
“It is a necessary part of the transmission grid in North America and we still think it will get built,” he said.
He said that when the new owners come up with a new cost estimate — the project was initially pegged to cost $1.7 billion — the CIB will take another look using the due diligence it has already performed and consider whether to offer the loan again.
He said the project would allow Ontario to sell electricity to Pennsylvania and several other U.S. states that are part of the largest electricity market in the world. The line would be able to operate in both directions, potentially shipping power back to Ontario when the province is in shortage.
Cory said it is also predicted to lower greenhouse gas emissions by allowing both jurisdictions to import green electricity from each other.
Mark Winfield, a professor from York University, also testified to MPs, but said he can’t understand why the CIB thought the project would be viable. He said if the line is predicated on Ontario having power to sell it would be a failure.
“The complicating factor here is the assumption that there would be significant surplus generation available for export and everything we’re seeing in Ontario suggests the opposite,” he said. “I can’t see where the surplus generation of any significance was going to come from.”
Advertisement 4
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Cory also received several questions about the CIB’s compensation for employees. He said the people the bank is attracting are coming from private industry and the bank has to at least be competitive with what they would receive at banks or other investment funds.
“People who work at the CIB come because they believe in the public sector mission of the bank and they take compensation that does not match what they can get in the private sector, but it does need to be at least competitive,” he said.
The bank paid out roughly $30 million in compensation in the last fiscal year. Cory said that is a relatively small amount given the size of the deals the bank completed that year. The Liberal government launched the infrastructure bank shortly after coming to power in 2015.
He argued it’s necessary to cover Canada’s significant infrastructure needs and leverage taxpayer dollars with private ones.
Advertisement 5
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.
Article content
“There are studies that talk about the hundreds of billions of dollars needed to be spent in this country and so the only way to do that is to find a way to draw in private and institutional pools of capital into these projects.”
Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what’s really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers.Sign up here.
Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here.